[Switch to the current edition of Connection »]
What Employees Want…
Why Engagement and Retention strategies are not necessarily the same
The workplace is changing faster than we have ever known. Where companies once relied on raw materials, they now rely on knowledge – in other words, the accumulated knowledge of their talent. This talent, ever more aware of its own worth, is adapting to a digital world that is more agile and more open than before. Research shows that many businesses are getting it wrong when it comes to engaging and retaining their people, in fact, some don’t know what their people really want.
Research, published by the Centre for Effective Organisations in cooperation with Korn/Ferry International, highlights the gap between perception and reality. The paper looks at what employees say makes them stay in a job, and the real impact of retention factors.
Firstly, satisfaction with a work/life balance is valued by all employees, of all ages. However, it has next to no statistical impact on retention. The same is true for strategic clarity. All employees, regardless of age, feel more commitment to an organisation if they understand its strategic direction. This does not mean that they are any more likely to stay.
Finally, paying individuals for organisational performance has next to no positive impact on retention for European employees (while in the United States, the inverse is true). On the other hand, paying people for individual performance has a positive impact on retention.
So what really drives retention?
The paper claims that innovation is a major driver; people want to work for organisations that are innovating, cutting down bureaucracy and differentiating themselves as employers.
Employees want to develop their skills and be given financial reward for their own achievements. And, the more development opportunities they are given, the more likely they are to stay.
They equally value their role as part of their overall career progression. This does not mean ‘moving up the ladder’ within the same business, but increasingly means ‘moving up the ladder’ in a global sense – with any organisation.
And here’s the problem: how do you retain employees who view work/life balance as a given, and who view your organisation as a step on the global employment ladder? You can increase engagement by providing a good work/life balance, and you can gain further commitment by giving them strategic clarity, but neither of these will help you actually retain talented people.
It’s time for businesses to create an employer brand fit for the 21st century. Employees are seeking individual reward packages linked to performance, with a clear view of their own personal development and progression. They are in search of innovative businesses that offer them greater autonomy – not just in their working environment, but in how they work: flatter structures, more responsibility, and more taxing work.
And that’s the new challenge – building an employer brand that meets the expectations of a more demanding workforce, and a strategy that views engagement and retention as two distinct end results.
Comments
1 RICHARD BINNS
The report appears to be too specific in suggesting “reward” is the answer. Surely identity is far more important. Reward for performance is another word for “greed” and own personal satisfaction, and that helps no-one except the individual. There is no “I” in “team”? Greed led to many of the current problems and will again if attitudes do not change. The best company I ever worked for was one where the “owner” who visited every 2/3 months did not do any business until he had greeted every employee. A change in MD started the rot as staff left, and was accelerated when the owner died and a relative took the reigns the attitude was one about greed and making money, and looking at markets that the company was totally inexperienced in. Staff felt alienated, and distant to the “new” regime!. People could not get out of there fast enough as profits fell and dis-satisfaction took hold. People need to feel part of where the organisation is going and see their own fortunes progress likewise, without needing to know the stategy (unless it directly affects themselves). They no longer felt part, just a “number”? A better than average salary will always been seen as a better option to a low salary and big bonuses (and/or generous overtime etc). Employees also need to feel that their bosses are not “milking” the system? Flashy cars and regular expenses, and perks gallore will kill off any good feelings within the organisation if employees only see themselves as losing real value in the workplace - at the expense of their bosses - whether and to what degree it may or may not be the case. Perception may play too big a part? Like many today I have seen no pay increase for three years, my standards have slipped by 14+% and will get worse before 2012, and that is now another aspect which needs to be addressed before I, personally, will ever feel good about my place of work, and the workplace in general.
posted on 7th July, 2011Have your say