Sex discrimination, maternity leave and the Royal family

Stamping out inequality

There are two notable recent changes to employment law relating to the Sex Discrimination Act. Both came into effect on 6 April and will have far-reaching implications. A further, separate proposal involving the Royal Family would have even greater consequences regarding the equality of the sexes.

Sex Discrimination Act

The definition of sexual harassment has been expanded. The new definition includes people who feel that they have been subjected to the unwanted conduct of other people in the workplace. In other words – sexist comments and “banter”.

So, this means that even those who are not subjected to the comment or the banter directly can make a complaint. Employers now need to ensure that banter and emails do not get out of control and implement rules and procedures for reporting and handling allegations of harassment.

Employers will be held liable for sexual harassment when they knowingly fail to protect their employees from repeated harassment by third parties, such as customers. To be liable, the employer must know that the employee has been subjected on at least two other occasions by a third party – but not necessarily the same third party.

Additional Maternity Leave

There is no longer a distinction between ordinary and additional maternity leave for entitlement to non-pay benefits. This now applies to women who give birth on or after 5 October 2008.

This now means that a pregnant employee will receive the same contractual benefits during additional maternity leave (i.e. the second 26 weeks) as in ordinary maternity leave (i.e. the first 26 weeks). These contractual benefits include annual leave, pensions and company cars.

This modification comes at a time when employers are apparently increasingly taking into account candidates’ chances of falling pregnant before employing them.

A survey found that more than two-thirds of recruitment professionals would like more rights to ask candidates about their plans for a family. 86% of them would feel cheated if a candidate started and then announced within weeks that they were pregnant.

However, this kind of questioning is banned under the Sex Discrimination Act, and an employee is not legally obliged to give notification until 6 months into the pregnancy. However, once the employer has been informed, the employee is entitled to certain rights:

  1. protection against less favourable treatment
  2. protection against being subjected to detriment or dismissed for a reason connected to her pregnancy
  3. the right to paid time-off for antenatal care and protection against being treated less favourably for taking time off for antenatal care
  4. the right to health and safety protection

The Royal Succession

In a separate, yet no less interesting development, a recent report in the Daily Telegraph suggested that the ‘rule of primogeniture’ could soon end, meaning that women would have equal rights to succeed the throne.

Solicitor General Vera Baird said that the right of males to succeed ahead of older sisters was “unfair” and that she has “always thought that what we have to do with the Royal Family is integrate them as far as possible into the human race.”

Any changes would not affect the current line of succession, but would start with Prince William’s offspring. Should he have a daughter ahead of a son, his daughter would be first in line and become Queen.

The proposal is part of the Single Equality Bill, which will bind together all current laws on sex discrimination, age, race, disability, sexual orientation and religion.

printer-friendly formatPrinter-friendly format

Bookmark this page

ADD TO DEL.ICIO.USDel.icio.us ADD TO DIGGDigg ADD TO NEWSVINENewsvine ADD TO REDDITReddit ADD TO TECHNORATI FAVORITESTechnorati ADD TO GOOGLEGoogle

 
Connection NewsletterCeridian